|
Knights
in Dirty
Armour
"
Condemning Half
Cocked - Whole
Truth Not Wanted
"
The Courts of Criminal Appeals base their opinions on the
facts given them by the appellate counsel and finally the Attorney
General. Then, ideally,
a rebuttal to the Attorney General’s argument by the appellant’s
counsel. However,
when the defendant is indigent and her counsel is appointed …such as
is the case here, and
that counsel is the Oklahoma Indigent Defense System, the dictate of the State (of
Oklahoma) is that there not be a
rebuttal to the State (of Oklahoma). Wolves dictating to the
shepherd not to protect their helpless sheep.
As Dr. Distefano stated in both testimonies of both trials,
“If the information I received was in error then the opinion I make
based on that (erroneous) information is in error.” This is the clear case
here. The Court of
Criminal Appeals had both erroneous information and incomplete
accurate information.
This is by design of the Oklahoma statutes, not our federal
government. Conservation of funds is tantamount and the Oklahoma
Indigent Defense System is overburdened, understaffed, and fund
restricted. Thus no
critical rebuttal to any errors made by the State (Attorney General)
and the State made at least one crucial error that was not allowed
to be corrected; that being the time element of the “late date”
parietal fracture. The
judges on the Court of Criminal Appeals were totally ignorant of
this fact and based their erroneous opinion on erroneous
misinformation such as this. No one explained to them that
the parietal fracture did not exist at the time of our Ben’s entry
into St. Francis hospital.
They erroneously assumed that this fracture, that
could not be accidental, was inflicted before our Ben
was taken to Mayes County Medical Center, when it was
not
Errors such as this is why there are more than just one
innocent people behind prison walls.
82
It is pathetic, the miniscule amount of information the Court
of Criminal Appeals received and reviewed to make their decision to
destroy an innocent life.
If I were a 6th judge on that panel and received
only the fragment of information they received and believed it to be
complete and coming from a reliable unbiased source, I, too, would
concur with their decision to destroy Marie. Especially that it is my own
son to be; that called me “daddy,” that lay in the grave. However, I know the
true facts.
Ignored altogether is the atrocious misconduct by Judge Post
and Charles Ramsey that the Court of Criminal Appeals received no
knowledge of.
Judge Post, when she publicly declared before the
trial that my Ben was a “murder victim” is and by itself proof that
the trial was not going to be a fair one. The Court of Criminal
Appeals had no privy to this facet of warped prejudice of Judge
Post.
Catrina Conrad-Legler was not allowed by the state to clarify
to the Court of Criminal Appeals that the …“Two inch fracture” that
Ramsey used to graphically portray Ben’s brains, “Bulging,
squishing, gushing out of the top of his head” did
not exist before Ben entered the hospital. That, alone, would be
reason enough to launch an in-depth investigation. I question why, now
that Attorney General Nancy Elizabeth Connley knows of this serious
discrepancy, she herself does not seek the
truth.
The Court of Criminal Appeals read Charles Ramsey’s quote of
Dr. Mark Krouse to the jury,
“You heard Dr. Krouse, the Schoonover’s own expert, say that
this could not have happened from a fall.” Condemning enough for me, if
a judge, to hang Marie.
But I heard and read the transcript. That is NOT what Dr. Krouse
testified. Dr. Krouse
testified quite the opposite, as is written in Part I, “The finding
of a child such as Ben, with no signs of abuse, no old or new
bruises, no visible injuries; it is likely a fall.” Assimilating that
{Prosecutor Misconduct} alone would cause an informed panel
of judges to reverse the conviction; and should cause
Attorney General Nancy Elizabeth Connley to launch an investigation
to seek the truth.
83
It is certainly contrary to what Judge Post publicly declared
before the trial about “the bruises…murder
victim…consistent with a pattern of child abuse…” The Court of Criminal
Appeals read this…convincing enough to destroy Marie…The Court of
Criminal Appeals was not privy to the truth of testimony: “No signs of abuse, no
old or new bruises, no visible injuries; it is likely a fall that
caused this child’s death.”
The Court of Criminal Appeals also read the quote of Dr.
Block by Ramsey that “These injuries are only found in
child abuse cases such as this one.” “Dr. Block is THE expert in
the field; there is no one better.” Bolstering the witness is
highly irreprehensible and a competent prosecutor would not do so
but believing that ‘quote’ as fact is:
More reason to condemn Marie for the death of my child. I, too, would condemn her if
Dr. Block, an “expert in the field of child abuse,” did in fact
testify that statement.
A sixth vote for life in prison from this
judge.
But that is NOT what Dr. Block testified. Fifty cases of child abuse
death studied show that the majority are the result of cranial
fractures. Five hundred
cases of accidental child death studied ALSO are the result of
cranial fractures. Dr.
Block knows this and what Dr. Block testified is that “This type of
injury is usually found in child abuse cases.”…and he
did NOT testify, “such as this one.” That perverted composition
is Ramsey’s alone.
The Court of Criminal Appeals also did not read Dr.
DiStefano’s statement to the Court…and the jury was not allowed to
hear it, “No one is saying this child did not die from a fall.”
Well, I am saying it now: Benjamin Schoonover did not
die from the accidental fall and resulting ½” occipital fracture at
about 1833 hours the evening of October 29, 1999. Ben died two days later
after Dr. Philip Barton convinced me to disconnect the life support
system. Ben could still
be alive today had I not yielded to his persuasion. Ben would also not have
the…
84
“Two inch fracture” that he did not have when he entered the
hospital. The one
Ramsey graphically illustrated to the jury where Ben’s brains
were “bulging,
squishing, and gushing out the top of his
head.”
The Court of Criminal Appeals wrote in their decision, “We
find in Proposition III that any rational trier of fact could find beyond a
reasonable doubt that (Gilda delivered a fatal blow which
resulted in Benjamin’s death.”* First, though not
paramount, is the fact that the physicians did testify that the
medical evidence is that it was not a blow to Benjamin’s head
but Benjamin’s head impacting a solid object (a fall). *they refer to the
“reasonable hypothesis standard” in Jackson v Virginia 99 S.Ct. 2781 (1979)
and Richie v. State, 903 P.2d 236 (1995) which states that one must
“exclude every reasonable hypothesis other than guilt.”
It is certain that the medical evidence alone presented by
all of the physicians that saw Benjamin alive and those who examined
the hospital records cannot state that Benjamin did not fall from a
piano bench onto a cement floor and receive a one/half inch (12mm)
occipital fracture from that fall and die…which is exactly how it
happened; it is the only way it could have
happened. With
only this information the Court of Criminal Appeals would
have to reverse the conviction of my innocent wife. Even if they thought
she might be guilty.
However, the Court of Criminal Appeals focused their tunnel
vision on: Attorney General Patrick Crawley, “Toddler’s head was
busted open” and Charles Ramsey’s “Brains gushing out the
top of his head” and they have a “Two inch (48mm)
fracture from the autopsy .
No way, in my mind, could Ben fall in the house, even off the
table as evidence shows he did, on cement, as he did, and receive
such a large parietal fracture. It couldn’t happen and it
didn’t happen. This
fracture, in my mind, was not an accident. There is no way it could
be. It was
inflicted.
Ben lived two days after the accident. Had it been abuse and had
there been any violence such as was accused to inflict a blow
sufficient to result in a two-inch (48mm) parietal fracture bruises
would have developed in those two days. There would be no hiding
them. There were none
to be hidden.
85
There did develop a bruise at the site of the occipital 12mm
fracture that is in the radiologist’s report. But there was no bruise
development at the 48mm fracture site (parietal) from which Ramsey
attested to the jury:
“brains gushing out the top of his head.”
This fact tells all that that fracture was
inflicted after my Ben was dead.
The Court of Criminal Appeals knew nothing of this. Had they been fully informed
there is no way they would have upheld Marie’s highly illegal
conviction in the Kangaroo Kourt of Mayes
County.
One of the judges on the Court of Criminal Appeals
wrote:
“Schoonover did not testify and made no objection to evidence
which suggested he might have delayed taking Benjamin
to the hospital.” This
shows inattentiveness or lack of information available to that
judge. A careful
examination of the court transcript shows that there was no evidence
of any “time delay” as Nora Stanart testified she spoke with Ben
after 6:30PM and the records of the hospital (19 miles away) show
and the nurses testified that we were in the hospital, with Ben, at
7PM. There is no time
for any “time delay.”
It was Ramsey that lamented to the jury of a “45 minute time
delay” in his closing argument. I could not object as when I
called attention to this flagrant misleading of the jury I was
reminded that Judge Post ordered no interruptions!
“Had he known that evidence(?) would be used to support any
accessory after the fact charge, Schoonover could have changed his
trial strategy to contest the State’s timeline and any evidence(?)
that he helped his wife cover up the circumstances of Benjamin’s
injury.”
Charles Ramsey knew Judge Post would allow no rebuttal to his
closing argument no matter how far out in fantasy land it is.
\
86
It is difficult for me to fathom how such a high ranking
judge can see a 45 minute time delay between 6:33 PM and 7 PM …even
if he has no knowledge of the factual 19 miles distance between our
home and the hospital.
He simply paid no attention; putting all his faith and
judgment on Attorney General Nancy Elizabeth Connley who ignored the
fact that Ben did not have any two inch fracture when he
entered the hospital.
He also wrote, however, in his decision to reverse my
conviction, “Our resolution of the propriety of the accessory after
the fact conviction renders the remaining propositions moot. To assist evidentiary
presentation in a retrial, we note that some evidence presented
against Schoonover was irrelevant to any issue at trial and
was admitted in error.” And he lists some of the irrelevant
evidence.
The irrelevant evidence that was “admitted in error” is the
evidence(?) that was used solely to illegally convict
Marie.
I did not want vacated.
I wanted a remand for retrial. That is the only way I could
have shown during a retrial that my wife is
innocent.
I needed a retrial for the purpose of that
“evidentiary presentation.”
That need of mine, for Marie, is the reason Charles
Ramsey did not want to proceed with another
trial. He knew
that I knew his tit was in the wringer if I got on the stand! He also knew, as he knows,
there never was any evidence that Marie committed any crime at
all. He also knows that
there is solid evidence that she is innocent and he suppressed that
evidence because Charles Ramsey needed a scapegoat!
Judge Lile dissented the reversal of conviction. Superficially his argument is valid; he uses the extremely large
word “IF” frequently in his reasoning. He pulls out of the sky that
“IF” I “knew that the child was dying when he delayed taking
him to the doctor in order to cover up evidence of
abuse.”
That is an invalid accusation and shows he can either not
read a clock or cannot subtract 6:33 from 7:00 and know there was no
time for any delay of even seconds, much less 45
minutes!
87
I would concede that he would be correct IF I knew Ben
was dieing and IF I delayed taking him to the hospital and it
would make me an accessory just like Wendy Luke and I would
fall under the “Ryan Luke Law” …IF Ben had been abused! IF I knew Ben was
dieing …that is an absolute…and there is no way anyone could
have known Ben was dieing.
All I knew was that Ben had a seizure and fell.
Twice in my life I have held a human male in my arms that was
dieing. One time I knew
the male was dieing and there was absolutely nothing that could be
done to prevent it. I
comforted him as best as I could and felt the life drain from his
body. I did not rush
him to the hospital; he died in less than two minutes; Though it seemed much
longer. The other male
I thought would survive and drove as fast as I could with his head
in my lap to where an ambulance was waiting. He lived four hours. Judge Lile has not walked in
my shoes and has no right to question any decision of mine in a
life/death situation.
Judge Lile also did not read “No signs of
abuse” and he
cannot read a
clock. There could
not be any “delay” and had there been any abuse to start
with it could NOT have been “covered up.” Bruises would have
developed! One did
where the oxygen tank was placed on Ben in
Pryor.
This fantasy “time delay” would have all come out had I been
allowed another trial.
Judge Post knew, too.
Judge Post also knew that I learned of her public
announcement declaration of Ben as a “murder victim” before the
trial. That declaration
of guilt alone, by law, renders Marie’s conviction invalid and Judge
Post’s close association with prosecution witness Judy Girdner is
only an exacerbation of the wrongs she committed to illegally
convict Marie.
It goes back to
the late Attorney General Patrick Crawley and his statement of
semi-fact that Gilda Marie and I were both home when our boy had his
fatal accident. Patrick
Crawley stated, “This is direct evidence that the couple were
present when the toddler’s head was busted open.”
88
I wrote that he was not an evil man. I thought he was when I
first read “busted open” because Ben’s head was not “busted open,”
as all the physicians that examined Ben and the hospital records
that show no sign of visible or physical injury and only the
radiologist report revealed the hairline 12mm occipital fracture
that Dr. Barton stated was insignificant and that is certainly
not “busted
open.”
This “Busted
Open” declaration
by the Attorney General Patrick Crawley was imbedded in the
minds of the Court of Criminal Appeals. As Patrick Crawley states
this as fact and the Coroner reported this huge fracture and Charles
Ramsey graphically exhibited it to show Ben’s brains “gushing
out the top of his head” this is proof enough that there was
a non-accidental fatal blow to Ben’s parietal. How can there be any
doubt? The only
question is:
When was this fatal fracture
inflicted?
Only by reading the transcripts of both trials and no less
than twelve times there is the physicians’ reports that the
only fracture in existence before Ben’s post surgery was the
small “insignificant” (quoting Dr. Barton) hairline 12mm occipital
that Dr. Krouse stated was from a fall and Dr. DiStefano concurred
that such a fall as Ben experienced would most likely be fatal. An accidental death.
But this 44mm parietal “busted open head” was
not an accident.
It was intentional and I can only hope that Ben was in fact
dead when it was administered.
He may have still been alive. There is no way to
know. Death was not
guaranteed before this blow.
It is this post surgery inflicted fracture that Ramsey used
to convict my innocent Gilda Marie with his wild pantomime of the
eruptive geyser
activity of “Bens brains gushing out the top of his
head!” He cannot
deny knowledge of it.
We were present, as Patrick Crawley stated, when “The
toddler’s head was busted open.” But it was not at our home
nor was it when when Ben fell.
Ben’s turban was intact and in place when I was ordered to
lay him on the clean hospital bed and leave the area…with all
the other people present.
Ben’s turban was NOT in tact when the gross photos were taken
of Ben on the hospital bed where his body was contorted. The Coroner reports that it
was in tact when he received Ben.
89
Ramsey had
stipulated in court for the transporters that nothing happened to Ben en
route from the hospital to the Coroner. We were present…at
the hospital, but we had been ordered out of the room. We (Marie and I) were also
never alone with Ben at any time.
I discussed this fact with Kevin Adams and he advised me not
to point a finger at anyone.
Especially not a high ranking officer in the law
enforcement…specifically one from Mayes
County. Well, one such person has
been “relieved of duty” in association with the perjured Probable
Cause Affadavit and he is the only one who insisted on being alone
in the room with Ben, curtains drawn for privacy, to take the
photographs of his contorted body. And what
else?
I know one ex
Mayes
County deputy
that worked for this officer who could verify the capability of this
officer…who was later fired from another position for having illegal
drugs in a county vehicle. Toby Stanart, Marie’s brother, worked for
him. He, too, warned
against “going up against” this ex Dirty Knight Officer of the
Law. So I will back off
in fear…like a eunuch…and not suggest, but only asp what with and
just who could have inflicted the 44mm guaranteed fatal size
fracture in Ben’s parietal for his brains to “gush out the top of
his head” to get a conviction for a murder that did not exist?
If I knew only what the late Attorney General Patrick
Crawley knew and nothing else, that is, the knowledge that Ben’s
head was in fact “busted open” and that is the only information the
Court of Criminal Appeals had, I too would cast a vote for the life
sentence. That limited
knowledge is how Marie was convicted. No one bothered to check the
time, the distance or when the fatal inflicted injury
that convicted Marie was actually inflicted.
State Representative Opio Toure recently told Tulsa World
staff writer Brian Barber that he wants a task force to determine if
any executed defendant was innocent. “We know for a fact that we
have wrongly convicted people”…Is he referring to Marie as one? It would not take a “task
force” to show that! I
would submit: Take care
of the living first, while there is still time! Perhaps the concern is that
the innocent that are executed cannot file for restitution. Oh, I’m also advised not to
mention that subject.
90
“We know for a fact that we have wrongly convicted people.”
Because we know we have corrupt…little Dirty Knights in lower
offices lording it over the populace. We need to do a little
housecleaning.
Some good may come of the fact that two innocent people were
cast into prison. Had
this never happened we would not know how corrupt one prosecutor in
Mayes
County can be
and is. We would not
know that the Judge that advertises herself on full size billboards
as a great advocate for the prevention of child abuse does herself
throw child like temper tantrums on the bench when she does not “get
her way” and we certainly do not need judges like that or the Judge
Thomas who was recently ‘de-benched’ for playing with himself with
sex toys during trials.
He got away with it for so long though, as no one would say anything
lest, as it was reported in the paper, “I didn’t want to be found
dead in a ditch somewhere.”
So many live in fear.
I am one who does not.
I will not live in fear of Ramsey or Klatt or Post. There are those who “get in
the way” of tyrants like these and sexual deviates who are
found in ‘ditches,’ …even good FBI agents “commit suicide” for some
strange unknown reason and are found hanging in a tree; some
innocent victims that get in the way are never found. Abandoned zinc mines near
North East Oklahoma are a good place to put two girls in body-bags
filled with lime.
Closer to my home, I live near a big lake. Marie’s family is weak and
they live in fear.
Judge Dynda Post has done a great service for many…got great
publicity for her involvement in getting a pair of swine lungs for a
dieing woman whose lungs were burned years ago in a ‘suspected’
arson. One of her witnesses against me.
Charles Ramsey and Judge Post broke several of our Oklahoma and
Federal Constitution laws to secure an illegal conviction for me and
illegally incarcerate me in prison. I was told that I should
file complaints to the Oklahoma Bar about their flagrant abuse of
our laws. I’ve been
promised that I would receive help in doing so as “he is a dishonest
prosecutor” and “She should not be a Judge.” Fear has interfered and that
help has not come and I again “stand alone” to seek
justice.
91
I “stood alone”
when I filed the habeas in Federal Court because the Department of
“Corrections” discriminated against this 68 year old 100% Disabled
Veteran and held me beyond the actual sentence had been served
after the conviction was reversed…and to compound that;
medical negligence (dental), prescribing a “muscle relaxer”
(methocarbamol) for the pain of passing kidney stones…a real
physician properly treated that problem within hours after I was
released and a real dentist has restored my teeth. Ignoring infarctions as they
occur; “Come back
tomorrow at sick call” is why Stanford Osborn, A fellow inmate at
Crabtree “Corrections” in Helena died in 2002. Immediate care would have
saved fellow inmate and friend Pat Sanders, age 44, at Dick Conners
“Corrections,” March, 2005. He did not know what to do; I
do.
I suffered a great deal of physical damage due to the
law-breakers George Klatt, Judge Post and Chuck Ramsey and mental
anguish that is beyond the comprehension of anyone short of a
holocaust victim.
Hitler started small.
Brings to mind a group in which there was a suspected
“criminal” (Polish resistance) one of his lesser published
quotes: “Kill them all;
let God sort them out.”
No less disregard for the
law.
11 April 2005 I receive an email notifying me that I will
have an opportunity to present this documentary to Janet Reno,
former U.S. Attorney General.
She will be giving a speech on the very subject of “Wrongful
Convictions” April 15th at the Crowne Plaza Hotel in
Tulsa Oklahoma.
Thus she will receive a personalized printed copy of this
text and I address the following pages to
her:
Ms.
JANET RENO
Former U.
S. Attorney
General:
Everything I have written and published to the internet site
Knights In Dirty Armour (.com) and FreeMyMarie.com can be
substantiated by court records, Notarized letters to me And/or sworn
testimonies.
However:
92
Pieces fit together to form a picture that is obvious to many
but I cannot prove and thus cannot put on the internet and
publish. Then the
unrelated connection of a principle in this work directly connected
with the deaths of Danny and Cathy Freeman and the disappearance and
disposal in body bags of their teenage daughter Ashley Freeman and
her friend Laura Bible.
The information in a hand written document from the eye
witness present that was “along for the ride” and had no knowledge
there was going to be four murders, one planned and three
spontaneous. Two were
executions. Jeremy Reed
played no part in the rape of teenagers in Whitaker Childrens Home
in Pryor in 1975. Fear
of her own execution by the officer has her silenced. Anything I could write of
this would be “hearsay” and not considered “fact” in a court of law
thus I must leave this subject as fiction, and fiction has no place
in this documentary. At
least not before Marie is justly released and we can leave to a
safer “neighborhood.”
I could not afford to hire an attorney for myself for the
second trial. My
family hired James Rowan to represent Marie in our second
trial. James Rowan had
read over all the transcripts and agreed that the first trial was a
circus. It was obvious
neither of us were guilty and it would be a simple defense. He was content that I accept
Timothy Wantland as my defense attorney as it was “open and shut” as
far as I was concerned.
Almost open and shut as far as Marie was concerned as
there was proof she was not present at the accident and the
testimonies of Nora Stanart, Dr. Krouse and even the coroner (Dr.
Distefano) who testified “No one is saying this could not have been
an accident” (paraphrased as I need to write this before I have
another stroke and forget again).
My Court appointed attorney (Timothy Wantland) NEVER would
talk to me in private (without a deputy sitting at the table with
us) but assured he would have my bail ($500,000) reduced to
an amount my family could make…stated, in fact, that Judge
Goodpaster had agreed to reduce it to $25,000. At the araignment all was
going well but there was no mention of bail and when Judge
Goodpaster asked if there was anything else I started speaking up
and Tim Wantland stood in front of me with his back to the bench and
telling me to shut up; he had taken care of that! Well, he
hadn’t.
94
I had been silenced and the bail was not reduced. Timothy Wantland also NEVER acknowledged ANY
of my requests to speak to him about the case. After six unanswered letters
to him requesting consultation I fired him for disconcert and
negligence.
I was ready to go to trial without an attorney. A fool, perhaps, at the
time, but I was confident Mr. Jim Rowan would do as he said he
would; that was to prove that Marie was innocent. Jim Rowan promised he would
consult with both of us again before the
trial
In steps sapling young energetic Mr. Kevin Adams. I did not know who he was
when he came to see me and asked to represent me pro bono. I could not very well refuse
as he, like James Rowan, expressed that he could see that we were
both innocent; would work energetically and hand in hand with Jim
rowan and was going to prove that no crime had been
committed. He had a
physicist (but would not tell me his name) in Verdigris who would
show exactly how the single one/half inch (12mm) fracture occurred
to our boy. He was
elated that we had a life size mannequin of Ben dressed in the
clothes Ben wore that fateful night and a portable (though rather
heavy) sample of the ceramic floor Ben fell on to show the jury all
that could have happened to our boy.
Also many videos of our boy, including an hour long interview
with DHS workers in our home only days before the accident. When Ben was asked whose
house this is he replied, “Momma’s house,…Daddy’s house,…and BEN’S
house. …But not
yours!” This video
also shows after the interviewers left, Ben commenting that they
forgot their ice cream.
Ben was not short on intelligence and obviously an
extrovert. I expressed
my primary concern to Kevin
of Marie and he reassured me that he and Jim Rowan would work
together.
Jim Rowan did come to see Marie and I in the Mayes
County jail BUT
the jail officials would not allow him to see me or me to see
him! It had been
decided unnecessary and a
“conflict of interest” …though there was none.
95
During the trial I had been placed at the end of the table;
on the long side starting next to me was Kevin Adams, then a real
sharp ex JAG Marine {David Keesling}, then Marie, then James Rowan.
Kevin stated he did not
want Marie and I sitting next to each other AND he did not want me
to speak to Marie AND I should not speak to Jim Rowan. Also not to write notes and
give to Marie or Rowan …it was not a pleasant arrangement but there
was nothing I could do about it.
When I saw that the prosecutor was starting to invent time
that did not exist between the accident and arrival at the
hospital I brought this
to Kevin Adam’s attention and asked him to remember the logged phone
records at after 1830 with Nora Stanart, my two cell calls at 1845
and 1855 and entry into the hospital at exactly 1900 hours and asked
him to “Close that window”
that does not exist that Charles Ramsey is opening in a solid
wall. I was assured
that he would take care of it in his closing argument.
He didn’t. He
did emphasize “John was
not there.” several
times but no mention of the non-existent forty five minute “Time
Delay” that Ramsey had invented and convinced Judge Post …and nine
members of the jury, to accept. He rolled my dice; I
paid the price.
The highly inappropriate and illegal sua sponte “Accessory
After The Fact” charge initiated and introduced after the trial by
judge Post that was a ‘surprise’ to all was NOT any
surprise but to Jim Rowan, David Keesling, Marie and me! It is in the in limine
transcripts where Kevin Adams brought it up long before the trial
was scheduled; he submitted it to the prosecutor as a “deal” that
was not accepted.
Charles Ramsey did file the charge appropriately BUT, whether
anyone knew about it cannot be proved. It is a fact that he did not
give notice to Kevin Adams, and Dave Keesling and he certainly secreted
this fact from Judge Post or Judge Post may not have stuck her foot
in her mouth, and Jim Rowan would have no way of knowing it existed;
there was no “obligation” to give him notice.
96
It was this illegal “surprise” that supported the non
existent “time delay.”
Without this criminally created “surprise time delay” there
was NOTHING to show that any crime could have been committed by
either Marie or I.
No one but me (that I know of) likes Kevin Adams. They all think that his only
interest was in getting his Darrow Award. No one but me has faith in
him and confidence that he will get the Justice release Marie
deserves.
Asking him to do this was the first subject of conversation
over breakfast at the Village Inn following my release in November,
2004. As of this date I
know of nothing that has been done to this end. However, I have heard many
excuses. From others as
well and they all have roots in fear.
Fear of prosecutors.
Fear of Ramsey.
Fear of Judge Post.
Fear of George Klatt.*
Fear of Nancy E. Connley. Fear of offending each
other. To Hell with
Marie. She is a
nobody! Let her rot in
prison To Hell with John.
He is just a fanatic.
Hinder him getting his Social Security check and he will be
harmless. Label him
paranoid. Maybe the
biggest drug dealer in Mayes County has a body bag for him,
too, if he becomes too much of a cocklebur. *[ I
was told after the meeting that George Klatt
had
called and threatened Kevin Adams to ‘back off’ ]
This fear of retaliation by officials (present and past)
should not exist. It
was justified in Germany…six million times
sixty years ago. It is
not justifiable here and now for any reason even as small as only
criticism.
“Criminal Lawyers”
get criminals off.
It is a game. I
know personally of a woman who could not have shot her
husband accidentally with a .30-06. A man in Tulsa who
could not have shot himself in the side of the head with the
.22 rifle he was found with.
A stout man in a bar who could not have accidentally
shot himself in the chest with that particular weapon as was
described. Then there
is the FBI agent “hanging himself” in a wooded area…Yeah,
right! That
last has nothing to do with
Criminal Lawyers getting criminals
off.
96
“Criminal Lawyers” also are all citizens’ only weapon against
total tyranny.
“Criminal Lawyers” are all citizens’ only protectors of the
Constitutional Rights all citizens were given by our founders and
deserve.
When “Criminal Lawyers” fear corrupt prosecutors, fanatic
judges and dirty cops…Knights In Dirty Armour …none of us are
safe.
Gilda Marie Schoonover is not a “nobody.” Gilda Marie is a somebody
just as each of us are.
No more…but no less.
She is the remaining victim in this atrocity. The State may welch in its
obligation to pay restitution due me as having been found illegally
convicted by the violating by our “honorable” Judge Post and Charles
Ramsey of multiple Constitution Laws. That is far less of a shame
sham than that of the State refusing to launch at least an
evidentiary …a thorough evidentiary investigation…into the
many, many reprehensible improprieties that led to the “Wrongful
Convictions” of
Gilda Marie Schoonover.
All I ask is for that sane rational hearing. Without condoning a maniac
stomping up and down the halls among jurists flaying her arms and
chanting in anger “John did it, John did it, John did it; I know
John did it!” Allow me
to testify without another threat of an unappealable death sentence and I will prove my
Marie did not harm our boy.
John
Schoonover
25 April, 2005
Four years to this date
my innocent wife remains buried alive.
Back
/ Next
/ Home
| 
