In Memory Of:

Benjamin M. Schoonover

Home PageAbout UsSearchContact UsGuestbookLegal Corres.The SchoonoversFree My MarieOur-Info-Dex -ListOne Of Our LosesIntroductionCommentaryReferencesLessons In ParentingNo Good Deed....EpilogueKnights LogoMaries PoemInnocence LostOur Happy BoyTurn The Other CheekPregnant In PrisonInsignificant MarieHappinessPost Convict..ReliefMy Marie.....PrologueThe Fateful FallThe Doctors OrdersNo Goodbyes.....Lynched By HenchmenThey Gag Our WitnessNo Laughing MatterTyrants Decide GuiltTwo Innocent VictimsDelib ImproprietiesCast The First StoneTruth IgnoredSilence Him....Temper TantrumsLegal ReferencesCondemn Half CockedPost Mortum AssaultLegal Corres. IIKevin Adams Of OklaOklahoma StatutesDynda Post Plays GodGnats and CamelsThe AppealImpeachmentAttorney GeneralWhere Is HelpThe MotionCourt of AppealsGuestbook CommentsThe Supreme CourtPlea From MarieRestitutionHABEAS of 2007Northern DistrictTenth Circuit
Motion To  Exhume  The Truth

 

                     goldfoilshimmer_md_blk moving image3.gif


 

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF MAYES COUNTY

STATE OF OKLAHOMA

 

   John Schoonover and             ]

Gilda Marie Schoonover            ]

                    Petitioners           ]

                                                ]  

                                                ]            case # 1999-271

                   Vs.                        ]             {case # 2006-5   

                                                ]                 Okla.CCA}

                                                ]

State of Oklahoma                    ]

                   Respondent           ]

 

 

 

 

MOTION TO EXHUME THE TRUTH

 

 

 

Comes now, the Petitioners, Gilda Marie Schoonover and John Schoonover, Pro-Se, and submits the following as foundation for exhumation of Benjamin Michael Schoonover/Stanart to expose the truth without question of the injury or injuries that were used in the court of Judge Dynda Post to convince an ill-informed jury to convict the Petitioners of a criminal injury that did not exist either at all or prior to the death of our deceased child and a criminal act that could not have existed at any time. 

 

 

 

 

1

“This is a disagreement of professional opinion, which we are going to have a lot of in this trial.  And his opinion and the radiologist’s opinion are both opinions, nothing more.”  Judge Dynda Post, Tr. pg. 967 lines 12-15.

 

 

{“Opinions” are not evidence and opinions, fed the witnesses by George Klatt, according to Dr. Distefano in limine during the first trial, are all that supported any conviction.}

 

 

                   “It looks to me to be about two inches in length…and there is that crack right there, right there, … and right here and right here …”  Dr Philip Barton, Tr. pg. 948 lines 1-7.

 

 

Mr. Rowan:  “I am going to hand you what has been previously marked as Gilda Schoonover Exhibit Number 1 and ask you to look in the finding area.” Tr. pg. 966 lines 2-4.

 

 

                   Prosecutor Ramsey:  “Judge, may we approach? [Bench conference held]... “This is apparently a hospital record where a radiologist has apparently looked at this CAT scan and determined that she did not see any fracture there.  … I am certainly going to object to him testifying as to what she allegedly found and he didn’t find.”  Tr. pg. 966 lines 5-15.

 

 

2

                   Mr. Rowan:  “Judge, this is impeachment…”

Tr. pg. 966 line 16, Mr. Rowan was not allowed to finish his sentence as he was interrupted and overruled by Judge Post.

 

 

                    Mr. Adams:  “on behalf of Mr. Schoonover I object to him talking about this second fracture.  I ask the jury disregard it.  We have been given no notice of this.  It’s nowhere in the medical records.  I can’t find this anywhere from the previous trial and I don’t know the significance of it and I object to it.”  Tr. pg. 949 lines 3-8.

 

{The “significance” is to enflame the jury with non-existent injuries.}

 

 

                   Prosecutor Ramsey:  “Well, Judge, actually my question was directed to the original fracture.”  Tr. pg. 949 lines 10-11. 

 

 

                   Mr. Adams:  “I just ask the jury to disregard about the second fracture being found that the medical examiner didn’t find and we were unaware of.”  Tr. pg. 949 lines 12-14.

 

                   Judge Dynda Post:  “Overruled.  Mr. Adams, these are fractures of the same general area.  These are CAT scans.  I presume those were the ones that were introduced before.”  Tr. pg. 949 lines 15-17.

 

 

 

3

{They are not the “ones” introduced before as there were no such fractures on the original or the hospital radiologist’s report or in Dr. Bartons original written hospital report.  I would submit that it is incompetence for a Judge to “presume” anything!!}

 

 

                   Mr. Adams:  … “I want to make a record for severance.  It became apparent that this is mutual antagonistic defenses.  My client is unable to receive a fair trial while being tried with the other defendant.”  Tr. pg. 949 lines 22-25.

 

{Had there been the proper severance John Schoonover would have been free to testify for this defendant/petitioner.}

 

 

 

* * * * * * * * * * * * *

 

 

                   During the beginning of Mr. Rowan’s Closing:  “I would love to be up here and tell you exactly how Benjamin fell.  I can’t do that.  I know there is furniture in this house, just like there is in your and my house.” Tr. pg. 1286 lines 2-4, … Mr. Rowan was interrupted. 

 

                   Prosecutor Ramsey:  “Judge, I’m going to object.  May we approach?”  Tr. pg.1286 lines 5-6.

 

                   [Bench conference held.] Prosecutor Ramsey:  “Judge, counsel is about to make statements that Benjamin may have climbed on furniture and things of that nature and there is no evidence* to support any of that in the record and I’m going to object.” 

4

                   Mr. Rowan:  “Judge, it’s a reasonable inference from the evidence* that this house has furniture, that’s all I am saying.”

 

         

          Prosecutor Ramsey:  “That’s not in the testimony.*”

 

                   Judge Post:  There is no reasonable inference because there has been no testimony* about anything involving that room other than the rock hard floor.  The objection is sustained.” 

                    

 

                   Mr. Rowan:  “I move for a mistrial, Judge.  Thank you.”

 

 

                   Judge Post:  “Pardon me?”

 

 

                   Mr. Rowan:  “I move for a mistrial again.  Thank you.”

 

                   Judge Post:  “Grounds?”

 

 

                   Mr. Rowan:  “Because you are fairly limiting my closing argument and that is simply - - you know, it’s - -Judge, what I am arguing is a fair inference from the evidence* in this case and you are not allowing me to do that so, therefore, you are not giving me a fair trial.  Tr. pgs. 1286, 1287.

 

5

 

 

*Note the nomenclature:

 

                                 Mr. Ramsey uses the word

 “evidence,”

                               Mr. Rowan uses the word

 “evidence,”

                              Then  Mr. Ramsey uses the word “testimony,”

                              Judge Post uses the word

“testimony.”

 

                               Mr. Rowan is correct that there is “evidence,”

                          as Mr. Ramsey had introduced several                  

  photographs of the  Dining room and adjacent foyer in the original trial. The furniture is obvious.

 

 

         

 

           It is reversible error for Mr. Ramsey to have deliberately misstated the facts concerning this matter. It was also reversible error for Judge Post to ignore the “evidence” and deny Mr. Rowan the right to present to the jury his argument how the accident happened that resulted in the untimely death of our boy. 

 

            

                   Charles Ramsey’s argument was that Benjamin could not have slipped while running and sustained the injury he received.  We all agree that such is more impossible than possible. 

 

 

 

 

6

                   Benjamin could NOT have inflicted upon himself this “second set of {massive} fractures” that are not in the hospital reports OR, according to Kevin Adams, not even in the Coroner’s report, that the jury was told about because Judge Post presumed they existed and allowed Charles Ramsey to use to graphically demonstrate how “Benjamin’s brains were gushing out the top of his head” for 45 minutes. 

 

                   The simple fact is that Benjamin fell backwards, a rotational fall, from either the chair, piano bench or table, onto the adjacent concrete floor, at an impact rate of, quoting Dr. Goldsmith in the Journal of Paediatric Medicine and the California Oakland Tribune:  “A child falling three feet straight backward onto concrete can experience force of up to 173 time the acceleration of gravity.”  That acceleration rate increased significantly with the added height of either of the three pieces of furniture from which our Benjamin fell.

 

There was no child abuse, there was no murder.

                  

                   There were not even anyBruises to the murder victim” as Judge Post broadcast to the public media prior to the trial. 

 

                   There was no “Brains ‘bulging,’ ‘squishing’ and ‘gushing’ out the top of his head” as Charles Ramsey three times somberly pantomimed to the Jury.

 

                    There were no “massive fractures” as Prosecutor Ramsey lamented to the jury … or, at least not prior to Benjamin’s death in St. Francis Hospital.

7

                   Our Benjamin’s remains have been perfectly preserved for almost six years.  The answers to the questions of the “massive fractures” to our Benjamin’s cranium alleged to the jury are there.  They either exist or they don’t. 

 

                   Prosecutor Charles Ramsey as well as the late Attorney General Patrick Crawley advocated to the courts that they exist, i.e; Benjamin’s “Brains gushing out the top of his head” and “The toddler’s head was busted open”

 

                   Exhumation of Benjamin and examination of his perfectly preserved cranium will settle the question of whether there was Judicial and Prosecutor Misconduct of enormous proportion or foul play in St. Francis Hospital after Benjamin’s death to produce such fractures as necessary for Mr. Ramsey to obtain a conviction of our innocent Gilda Marie Schoonover for an injury she could not have inflicted as these “massive fractures” are not in the hospital records or mentioned in the first trial.

 

                   The truth is buried on a hill in the Alluwe Cemetery.  As long as it remains buried Justice for all cannot be served for our little Benjamin. 

 

                   The truth will set Gilda Marie Schoonover free.

 

                   Therefore the Defendants pray this Honourable Court to order the exhumation of Benjamin Michael Stanart/Schoonover to expose this hidden truth and who its concealment has too long been protecting from Justice.

8

 

 

 

Respectfully submitted, Pro-Se, In the interest of Justice,

 

 

                 (signed)       Gilda Marie Schoonover 404171

                                   Mabel Basset Correctional Center

                                          29501 Kickapoo Road

                                        McLoud Oklahoma 74851

                                    

 

 

 

                   (signed)        John Schoonover, U.S.N. Ret.

                               RR 1 Box 67 Cleveland Oklahoma 74020

 

 

*  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *

 

 

                   I certify that an original and seven exact copies have been mailed by certified mail to Michael S. Richie, Court Clerk of the Oklahoma Court of Criminal Appeals by certified mail on or before April 20, 2006, one copy to Attorney General Drew Edmondson.  Published on www at knightsindirtyarmour.com as MOTION TO EXHUME.

 

 

John Schoonover

RR 1 Box 67 Cleveland Oklahoma 74020

 

 

9

 

 

 

Filed Tuesday, July 18, 2006

Lori Parsons, Court Clerk

 

 

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF MAYES COUNTY

STATE OF OKLAHOMA

 

   John Schoonover and           ]

Gilda Marie Schoonover          ]

                    Petitioners           ]

                                                ]  

                                                ]            case # 1999-271 B

                    Vs.                        ]             {case # 2006-5   

                                                ]                 Okla.CCA}

                                                ]

State of Oklahoma                   ]

                   Respondent                   ]

 

 

 

 

 

REBUTTAL AND TRAVERSE TO EXHUME THE TRUTH

 

 

 

 

1.  That this court is without jurisdiction to hear this Motion. Trial was had and held hereon and the petitioner Gilda Marie Schoonover was convicted herein.  Said Conviction was upheld by the Oklahoma Court of Criminal Appeals.  There are no pending appeals or applications for Post Conviction Relief.  Therefore this court is without jurisdiction to grant any relief to the petitioner.                   Charles Ramsey

 

 Traverse:

                   This Motion was originally filed with the Oklahoma Court of Criminal appeals who returned it stating this is the jurisdiction of Mayes County.  Copy of OCCA Court Clerk available on request.  There IS a pending appeal being presented to the Northern District Federal Court.                                      

 

 

 

10

2. That Benjamin Schoonover died on or about 29 October 1999.  The matter of the exhumation of the body was never brought before the court prior to or during the two trials of this matter.                                                             Charles Ramsey

 

Traverse:

                   Benjamin died October 31, 1999. Prior to the two trials the only impact injury to Benjamin was a 44mm hairline occipital fracture resulting from a fall from furniture onto a concrete surface.  There were no other multiple fractures for  “Benjamin’s brains [to be] gushing out the top of his head” (Charles Ramsey).

 

 

3. The petitioner has failed to give notice to the family of the decedent by law.

                                                                                                Charles Ramsey

 

Traverse:

                   Mr. Ramsey is in error when he states the family had not been notified as the Motion To Exhume The Truth has been on the WWW months before the reports of the Kelsey Briggs’ exhumation. Ask any Stanart family member if they were “unaware” of this!  In addition; printed copies had been requested and mailed to the requesting Stanart family members.

 

 

                   Neither of Benjamin’s biological parents has objected to the exhumation of Benjamin for the truth.  The only reason they would object if is they had something to hide.  The maternal grandparents might object if there could be existing physical evidence to support the suppressed New Mexico medical records of Benjamin’s seizure activity.

 

 

 

4.  That the exhumation of the body in the state of Oklahoma is governed by 63 O.S. 946.  This statute allows for the examination of bodies that have been buried without the benefit of an autopsy performed by the office of the chief medical examiner.  The statute makes no provision for the exhumation of a body upon which an autopsy had been performed.  An autopsy was performed on the body of Ben Schoonover by Dr. Distefano.  Dr. Distefino testified at both trials of the petitioner.                                                                                         Charles Ramsey

 

 

 

11

 

Traverse:

                   Attached as exhibits are two articles from NewsOK.com on the WWW concerning the exhumation of Kelsey Briggs, who also had an autopsy.  Kelsey Briggs was similar in age to our Benjamin.  There the comparisons end as Kelsey Briggs was beat all to Hell, expired with multiple bruises, fractures and visceral injuries; our Benjamin had none of these. 

 

                   Further, it is clear from District Attorney Richard Smothermon’s statement that Kelsey Briggs could be exhumed “without his blessing,” referring to Lance Briggs, Kelsey’s father.  Oklahoma Statutes do NOT prevent exhumation of an autopsied cadaver where there is suspected foul play.  The legal exhumation of Kelsey Briggs moots Charles Ramsey’s claim of no provisional Statutes.

 

 

5. The petitioner has failed to advise the court of any benefit to be gained by the exhumation of the decedent.  The homicide occurred in the year of 1999, that being almost 7 years ago. The condition of the body would prohibit any analysis which would be more beneficial than that examination conducted by the medical examiner.                                                                                         Charles Ramsey

 

 

Traverse:

                   Mr. Ramsey is in error that 7 years would deteriorate Benjamin’s cadaver beyond any beneficial purpose.  Even if the vault leaked and the Stainless Steel casket deteriorated and the formaldehydes failed to perform their intended purpose, 7,000 year old cadavers are discovered with their skeletal components in tact.  Benjamin’s skull has not deteriorated unless George Klatt threw in a bag of lime!  That is unlikely in this case.  The Truth is still there.  Only the guilty have any fear of it.  A second autopsy would confirm that there is only one hairline 44mm fracture, of the occipital, and no others, confirming the specific Prosecutor Misconduct by Charles Ramsey when he lamented with pantomime in his closing argument that was objected to but over ruled by Judge Post, three times, of “Benjamin’s brains bulging, squishing, gushing, out the top of his head!” “for 45 minutes.” 

 

 

12

 

6. Further, the court and the parties have had the benefit of the testimony of Dr. Barton, the treating physician of the decedent.  He was able to provide testimony concerning the injuries that Benjamin received and the manner in which these injuries affected Benjamin Schoonover and eventually caused the death of Benjamin Schoonover.                                                                    Charles Ramsey

 

Traverse:

                   The only party that had any benefit from the testimony of Dr. Barton was Charles Ramsey when he had Dr. Barton illustrate and point out several multiple fractures on an MRI that Charles Ramsey provided, that Judge Post “presumed” was the same one at the original trial and disallowed defendant’s exhibit of the original MRI and radiologist report that Charles Ramsey admitted [out of hearing of the jury]: “Shows no fractures” visible to the keen eye of an experienced radiologist.  Dr. Barton is not a qualified radiologist.

 

 

7. Further, the petitioner had the benefit of all medical records of Benjamin Schoonover concerning the injuries received and the cause of death.  In addition to having the medical records they took said records to their medical expert for his examination and had the benefit of his testimony during the trial of this matter.

                                                                                                        Charles Ramsey

 

 

Traverse:

                   The records show, and it is specific in the testimony of Dr. Krouse, that there was but one single injury and not the multiple injuries Mr. Ramsey repeatedly tells the jury.  He is also partly correct: There are the records; though not available to either petitioner as both petitioners were in separate prisons disallowed to communicate with each other or with each other’s appellate attorneys.  Only Defendant John Schoonover had a copy of the transcripts that clearly show that Dr. Barton originally reported NO fracture in his records when commenting on the original MRI that Charles Ramsey said, outside of the hearing of the jury, that this is a radiologist’s report that shows NO fracture.  That Dr. Distefano testified that there was a single 12mm hairline occipital only fracture that played no part in the death as did Dr. Krowse testify.  Both physicians testified that “brain swelling” caused the death of our boy. 

 

13

Not any series of “inflicted injuries” created by Charles Ramsey for the ears of the jury and as Judge Post created for the media [“bruises on the murder victim”] Contradicting  truth in the trial transcripts unknown to the jury. A further truth is that Dr. Distefano did testify, again outside of the hearing of the jury, that “No one is saying that a child cannot fall from a chair onto a hard surface and receive a fatal injury.”   Charles Ramsey retarded that observation from the jury. 

 

Dr. Distefano also testified, out of hearing of the jury, that he had based his “opinion” of homicide on the reports his investigator obtained from Charles Ramsey’s investigator; the same George Klatt that perjured the Probable Cause Affidavit.  The same George Klatt that advised Dr. Distefano that the defendants “refused to talk” so he did not ask to interview them.  The same George Klatt, The State’s Chief Investigator, that Neither defendant was allowed to put on the stand at any time and cross examine under oath.  Judge Post stated that “Opinions are not evidence” but Judge Post allowed only the opinions of the State in the closing arguments.  That bias is why a miss-trial was asked for by defense attorney James Rowan as this bias by Judge Post made it clear to Mr. Rowan, as he stated: It was not a fair trial!

 

Exhumation will confirm whether or not Prosecutor Charles Ramsey was telling the truth or a deliberate and malicious liar as he pantomimed the “Brains gushing out the top of his head.”  This is a truth that should not be kept buried. 

 

Finally:                

                   A formal complaint has been filed, by one of the two Petitioners, with the Oklahoma Council on Judicial Complaints concerning this matter and that having been advised it would be appropriate that Judge Post recuse.

Any opinion Judge Post would render in this matter would most surely be ‘self serving’ for survival of her miss-placed integrity and abuse of power.  This petitioner feels that as the response to the Motion is made by the two key elements in the unlawful conviction of this Petitioner that requesting such justice is little different than asking a rabid dog to accept responsibility and punish itself for its wrong doing. 

 

14

                   Nothing this Petitioner has written has ever been controverted. 

 

                   Severance was never allowed.  The two Defendants, John Schoonover and Marie Schoonover, have always been “In the same boat” sticking together.  Defendant John Schoonover only, submits the following:

 

                   If Judge Dynda Parks Post and the State of Oklahoma is so sure that Gilda Marie Schoonover is guilty as charged; may I ask that they stand by my side as I sue the State and Mayes County for $4 million for the four years of illegal confinement they illegally inflicted upon this innocent victim of theirs for the same charge? I need the money to continue my pursuit of Justice for My Innocent Marie.

 

                   However: There are a few in number that blindly believe in the system and remain convinced that I am guilty of murder or that Marie is guilty of murder or that we are both guilty of murder.  “Doubting Thomas’, if you will.”  His Gospel should have been included in the Holy Bible. 

 

                   Therefore: If Benjamin’s head was in fact “Busted Open” as the late Assistant Attorney General Patrick Crawley stated, with multiple fracture in the top of his head that could not be accidental as Charles Ramsey told the jury, for Benjamin’s Brains to actually “squish and gush out the top of his head,” and it could be shown that George Klatt did not commit this act, then Charles Ramsey would not be guilty of Prosecutor Misconduct and Judge Post’s indiscretion with the news media would be moot.  Exhumation with the above findings is the only avenue that can convince This Defendant that I am not fighting a Just battle; that I should, and would, remove my website and books, Knights in Dirty Armour I & II, and judicialjackasses.com from world wide distribution.  I would consider my four years of illegal confinement an “honest mistake” and not seek compensation for that illegal and cruel confinement.

 

                   Nothing this Petitioner has written has ever been controverted. 

 

 

 

15

 

 

 

Respectfully submitted, Pro-Se, In the interest of Justice,

 

 

 

 

                  [signed]       Gilda Marie Schoonover 404171

                                   Mabel Basset Correctional Center

                                          29501 Kickapoo Road

                                        McLoud Oklahoma 74851

                                    

 

 

 

                   (signed)        John Schoonover, U.S.N. Ret.

                               RR 1 Box 67 Cleveland Oklahoma 74020

 

 

 

 

 

 

Published on WWW at http://knightsindirtyarmour.com

Titled Rebuttal/Traverse

 

 

* * * * * * * * * * * * *

 

 

There is only one reason anyone would want to hide

 The Truth.

 

 

 

* * * * * * * * * * * * *

 

 

16

 

Almost everyone has a price.  The morning of July 21, 2006, I received a call from an attorney in Tulsa.  $50,000.  Up front.  If Marie and I had not lost our $175,000 home and virtually all personal assets due to George Klatt and his Perjured Probable Cause then I could and would mortgage our $175,000 home.  But it sold at auction for $118,000.  Thank you, Mayes County.  Thank you, Judge Post.  Thank you, Charles Ramsey.  For breaking us and taking my innocent wife and torturing her to the end of her life. 

 

It would take me ten years to pay $50,000.  I could do it, but only if I lived that long, which is doubtful.  But the attorney, who is so sorry he can’t help, without the $50,000, wished me “good luck” with my Pro-se battle.  He called it a “knife fight” with Judge Dynda Post.  “She is a powerful wicked witch.”  But she is also a Humpty Dumpty.  Just as was Adolph, and Saddam.  Only on a much smaller scale.  This is not intended to be an insult to the late dictators; they were not Wolves in Sheep’s Clothing.  Humpty Dumpty was also not a rotten egg.  Had he been, he would not be remembered for so long but would have long ago faded into obscurity. 

 

July 18, 2006 I received acknowledgment from the “Council on Judicial Complaints”, 1901 North Lincoln Blvd, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma 73105 [phone 405-522-4900].  A simple and short letter: Dear Mr. Schoonover:  Your complaint against Judge Dynda Post has been received.  It has been forwarded to the members of the Council on Judicial Complaints.  You will be advised when proceedings on your complaint are completed.  Sincerely, [signed] Eric Mitts, Director.”  {see S.Ct: In re Murchison 349 U.S. 133 [1955] that a Judge posses neither actual or apparent bias}

 

We will see how far Ms. Humpty Dumpty falls into the frying pan.  Will she simply get a private ‘slap on the wrist’ for breaking so many laws of our State and country’s Constitution to cage in prison two innocent people for so many years?  We will see how the wheels of Oklahoma Justice turn.

 

John Schoonover

knightsindirtyarmour@yahoo.com

freemymarie@netzero.net

RR 1 Box 67 Cleveland Oklahoma 74020

 

17

 

                                                                Back / Next / Home

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 


Home Page | About Us | Search | Contact Us | Guestbook | Official Correspondence and Response | The Schoonovers | Free My Marie | Info-Dex | One Of Our Loses | Knights In Dirty Armour | Comentary | References | Knights In Dirty Armour II | K.I.D.A II | Epilogue | Knights Logo | Maries Poem | Innocence Lost | Our Happy Boy | Turn The Other Cheek | Pregnant In Prison | Little Insignificant Marie | Happiness | Post Conviction Relief | My Marie..... | Prologue | The Fateful Fall | The Doctors Orders | No Goodbyes...... | Lynched By The Henchmen | They Gagged Our Witness | No Laughing Matter | Innocent Or Guilty... Tyranny Decides | Two Innocent Victims | Deliberate Improprieties | He Who Would Cast The First Stone | Truth Ignored | Silence Him. Cut Communications | Temper Tantrums On The Bench | Legal References | Condemning Half Cocked Whole Truth Not Wanted | Sombody Had To Kill Ben | Legal Correspondence II | Kevin Adams Criminal Defense Atty | Oklahoma Statutes | District Judge Dynda Post Plays God | Straining Gnats... Swallowing Camels | The Appeal | Impeachment | Attorney General  | Where Is Help When You Need It | Motion To Expedite | The Oklahoma Court of Criminal Appeals | Guestbook Comments | The Supreme Court | Plea From Gilda Marie | Restitution | HABEAS of 2007 | The Northern District | Appeal To The Tenth Circuit