In Memory Of:

 Benjamin M. Schoonover

Home PageAbout UsSearchContact UsGuestbookLegal Corres.The SchoonoversFree My MarieOur-Info-Dex -ListOne Of Our LosesIntroductionCommentaryReferencesLessons In ParentingNo Good Deed....EpilogueKnights LogoMaries PoemInnocence LostOur Happy BoyTurn The Other CheekPregnant In PrisonInsignificant MarieHappinessPost Convict..ReliefMy Marie.....PrologueThe Fateful FallThe Doctors OrdersNo Goodbyes.....Lynched By HenchmenThey Gag Our WitnessTyrants Decide GuiltTwo Innocent VictimsDelib ImproprietiesCast The First StoneTruth IgnoredSilence Him....Temper TantrumsLegal ReferencesCondemn Half CockedPost Mortum AssaultLegal Corres. IIKevin Adams Of OklaOklahoma StatutesDynda Post Plays GodGnats and CamelsThe AppealImpeachmentAttorney GeneralWhere Is HelpThe MotionMotion To ExhumeCourt of AppealsGuestbook CommentsThe Supreme CourtPlea From MarieRestitutionHABEAS of 2007Northern DistrictTenth Circuit
No Laughing  Matter

                                           goldfoilshimmer_md_blk moving image3.gif

 

                                                            Knights in Dirty Armour     

                                                           

                   "No Laughing Matter"

Dr. Distefano, the Coroner, testified almost the same as rehearsed at the first trial.  To Ramsey’s barrage of scenarios and hypotheticals, “Would you expect to see these injuries (plural) from running and tripping, normal household falls, a trivial fall from a piano bench ‘like I described’?”, (slipping off and falling on his butt), “any simple fall?”  The answers were all “No”, and even I would answer “of course not!”  I would not expect any child to die from any trivial, simple, non-fatal fall regardless of the height.

 

     “Dr. Distefano, could you expect to find these injuries in a child who had been hit with a baseball bat?  Could you expect to see these injuries in a child who had been picked up and thrown against a wall?”  The single word answer Ramsey wanted and coached to get is “Yes”, and I agree.  But witnesses are not allowed to volunteer:  “I would also expect in these scenarios accompanying bruising from the grip required to inflict such injuries.  I’ve seen it too many times during my ten years of licensed child care in Idaho.  If for no other reasons, and there are many others, this is how I know Marie could not have injured my Ben.

 

     Based on the information Distefano had, which he testified came from his investigator, John Pojmon, who got it from George Klatt (who perjured the probable cause affidavit), who, among other things (“confession”), told him the fallacy he erroneously assumed as fact and testified, “The Schoonovers refused to talk to the police, so I didn’t ask to interview them”.

 

     Dr. Distefano testified he did not know what Ben fell from, how he fell, or what he fell on.  “That was a good bit of information I did not receive.”  He did not know the accident was unwitnessed.  “He fell a lot, fell while running, fell off a rocking horse, fell off a ladder.”  Four scenarios that he was told came from the Schoonovers and none of these scenarios would likely result in death.

 

     When Jim Rowan cross-examines and starts to ask about a fall from standing on a piano bench, he is interrupted with one of many objections by Ramsey, as Post says, “Where does the piano bench come from, because we have no testimony about that?”2

 

     Considering the height of a piano bench, Dr. Distefano did volunteer, “I am not excluding that a child could fall from a height, land on an extremely hard floor, assuming the hardest (cement), and suffer a fatal injury.”

 

29

 

     Dr. Distefano answered Kevin Adam’s questions concerning retinal hemorrhages.  It was established they are caused by a variety of conditions:  “Intracranial pressure, deceleration in an impact injury, CPR.”  Dr. Distefano excluded “Shaken Baby” as a diagnosis which contradicted Dr. Barton’s initial misdiagnosisof “shaken baby”, because there was no skull fracture or impact evidence in his written report.

 

     Dr. Block would testify that retinal hemorrhages “are usually found in automobile accidents and child abuse.”

 

     Ramsey’s closing argument, days later, would ‘refresh’ the jury’s memory of what they heard:  “You heard Dr. Block, the expert in the field of child abuse, no one better(17).  Dr. Block said these retinal hemorrhages are only found in severe automobile accidents and child abuse cases like this one.18

 

     Dr. Distefano twice testified he considers a “Dr. John Plunkett to be a reliable authority forensic pathologist whose opinion deserves the respect of listening.”  Ramsey nitpicks that “Just because Dr. Plunkett is reliable doesn’t mean the article he wrote is.”19

 

     The Plunkett article19 is a thirteen page report of 19 short fall head impact fatalities.  Some falls are as short as two feet (0.67 meters).  Case 5 is a 23-month old who was straddling a rail twenty eight inches (0.7 meters) off the floor.  Jaci fell onto a 3/8”thick piece of carpet remnant covering the concrete floor.  She lost consciousness and was removed from life support 36 hours after the fall.  The fatal accident was videotaped by her grandmother.

 

     M. Ramsey objected no less than twelve times to keep the knowledge in Dr. Plunkett’s article from the jury.  Dr. Plunkett’s article contains the basic physics of acceleration impact loading (whiplash) and impact velocity, which clearly explains how our boy’s fall from a piano bench not only equates to, but exceeds that of a motor vehicles rear end impact of 30 MPH, which killed one of two restrained boys.20

 

     The Plunkett article contains 92 references from around the world, including “The Mistaken Diagnosis of Child Abuse:  A Form of Medical Abuse?”21

 

     A simple round table inquiry before or after the discovery that the Klatt/Ramsey Probable Cause Affidavit was perjured would have rectified Dr. Barton’s mistaken diagnosis, Dr. Distefano’s incomplete misinformation, Dr. Block would simply be moot and all of this would have been avoided.

 

 

 

30

 

     Attorney John Crockett of Pryor has in his files letters from both Marie and John requesting an interview with Ramsey before they had any knowledge of the Probable Cause Affidavit.  Ramsey refused any kind of discussion.  He had taken Klatt’s perjured Probable Cause at face value and publicly cried, “Fire”, when there was none.  Rather than accept responsibility for this bad act error in judgment, there was “no way out” but to start a fire where there was none, and then fight it in the public eye with everything he could invent to put it out.  Expending two innocent lives in the process for a front page smile and “I won!”

 

     No physician would testify that our Benjamin did not experience a rotational backward fall from a table or piano bench onto a cement surface, receive a 12mm occipital fracture from that fall, develop an acute subdural hematoma, retinal hemorrhages, brain swelling, and die.

 

     Dr. Distefano controverted Dr. Block’s adamant insistence that this was “Shaken Baby Syndrome”, stating tersely that there was no evidence to support that theory.

 

     Dr. Block did concede “nobody is saying that a child can’t die from a low-distance fall.”  But when he was asked about the video tape of Jaci’s 42” fall, he suspected that of being “Shaken Baby” too, and stated, “We don’t know what happened before the video was made … or after it was turned off.  Did her grandmother pick her up after she dropped the camera and shake her?  We do know that people do that!”

 

     A murder trial where employment22 and two lives are at stake is no laughing matter.  The response of the jury to Dr. Block’s comment was clear indication that the State’s case was in jeopardy.

 

 

     The State rested its case after all parties stipulated that Ben was transported from St Francis Hospital to the Medical Examiner without incident.

 

     Mr Adams and Mr Rowan both made a demur to the evidence.  Mr Adams submitted the argument that “as a matter of law, its insufficient facts to include that John is guilty of the crime of First Degree Murder.  There is no evidence and I would demur on that specific basis and a general demurrer as well.”

 

     “Motion denied.  Call your first witness.”

 

 

 

            31

 

   

                               Back  / / Home

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



Home Page | About Us | Search | Contact Us | Guestbook | Official Correspondence and Response | The Schoonovers | Free My Marie | Info-Dex | One Of Our Loses | Knights In Dirty Armour | Comentary | References | Knights In Dirty Armour II | K.I.D.A II | Epilogue | Knights Logo | Maries Poem | Innocence Lost | Our Happy Boy | Turn The Other Cheek | Pregnant In Prison | Little Insignificant Marie | Happiness | Post Conviction Relief | My Marie..... | Prologue | The Fateful Fall | The Doctors Orders | No Goodbyes...... | Lynched By The Henchmen | They Gagged Our Witness | Innocent Or Guilty... Tyranny Decides | Two Innocent Victims | Deliberate Improprieties | He Who Would Cast The First Stone | Truth Ignored | Silence Him. Cut Communications | Temper Tantrums On The Bench | Legal References | Condemning Half Cocked Whole Truth Not Wanted | Sombody Had To Kill Ben | Legal Correspondence II | Kevin Adams Criminal Defense Atty | Oklahoma Statutes | District Judge Dynda Post Plays God | Straining Gnats... Swallowing Camels | The Appeal | Impeachment | Attorney General  | Where Is Help When You Need It | Motion To Expedite | Motion To Exhume The Truth | The Oklahoma Court of Criminal Appeals | Guestbook Comments | The Supreme Court | Plea From Gilda Marie | Restitution | HABEAS of 2007 | The Northern District | Appeal To The Tenth Circuit