|
{ The Star Performer And The Prosecutor
}
KNIGHTS IN DIRTY
ARMOUR
"
Temper Tantrums On The Bench
"
The Court of Criminal Appeals wrote in their unpublished
decision that “Schoonover Did not commit the crime…and could not be
charged with it.”
That
is crystal clear.
At the public hearing for the dismissal of the illegal charge
prosecutor Ramsey addressed Judge Post, “The Court of Criminal
Appeals indicated they felt there was insufficient evidence to get a
conviction.”
This is another “misrepresentation” of the facts as to what
they actually did say: “Schoonover did not commit the crime.” One should not be surprised
at this continuing gross misrepresentation of facts. I find it extremely
difficult to believe that Judge Post did not know that this
statement of Mr. Ramsey was nothing short of a bare faced lie that
he look “good” in the eyes of the public that cannot read exactly
what the Court of Criminal Appeals did write as their decision is
“not for publication.”
Ramsey
publicly advised Judge Post he was reluctantly declining prosecution
because of “insufficiency of evidence” instead of the simple truth
that “Schoonover did not commit the crime” and dismissal is in fact
her only option because she had violated the Constitution of
Oklahoma as well as the Constitution of our United States in
criminally charging Schoonover with a crime she had to know
was not committed. By
John Schoonover or anyone else!
54
The courtroom was a theatre, Judge Post was the Star
Performer and Prosecutor Charles Ramsey was her Leading Man. It was an act put on for a
public spectacle. Judge
Post could not help but know that she had made a grave error of law
that no competent judge would make. It was quite clear that she
was distraught over the fact that the Court of Criminal Appeals had
“slapped her hand” when, in inexcusable ignorance of State and
Federal law, she sua sponte charged John after he had
been tried, with a phantom crime that had not been committed and by
law could not be charged with.
To add insult to injury concerning this criminally negligent
act John himself had presented to at the trial the crystal clear
caselaw and statutes written by the Supreme Court that explained to
her in detail that she was knowingly committing a serious
infraction of the law .
It was an insult to her competency during the trial that a
lowly common layman tells an egotistical judge she is wrong.
This perhaps shows her gross disconcertment towards all of
those whom she rules.
Tyrants typically pay no heed to peons and they are commonly
without any interest in justice which takes a back seat to public
image and when the higher court rebuked her for her act of tyranny
she rebelled the only way she knew how:
‘Take it out on’, ‘show her wrath’ to a youthful bystander in
the courtroom that could not suppress the relief she felt that her
senior friend was finally being justly set free from the tyranny
that had criminally separated and incarcerated John and his wife
years earlier.
An older woman sitting next to the youth sounded
a quiet “shhh” to the youth to quickly restore the solemn atmosphere
and she too was yelled at by the angered judge. The youth said to the judge
while pointing to the older woman. “She didn’t do anything” which
angered Judge Post even more and she raised to lean over the bench
flaying her hand in a condemning manner first to the youth then to
the senior and back again screaming, “don’t tell me what I saw” and
shouting that she was going to throw both of them in them in
jail. This childish
tantrum by a judge is inexcusable.
55
Judge Post had expressed her disgust with the decision of the
Court of Criminal Appeals that I “Did not commit the crime”
she had illegally charged me with and she simply could not accept
the fact that she was wrong!
I am confident that she remembered that I told her so
at the Sentencing hearing when I looked her straight in the eye and
declared that “I am guilty of nothing more than knowing my wife is
(totally) innocent.”
Judge Post had been so prejudiced by the rumors created by
Ramsey’s chief investigator George Klatt and amplified by prosecutor
Charles Ramsey and
spread by the media and Ramsey’s clever noumenon of deception in
creating false memories and blinded to the fact that there is
not forty five minutes between 6:33 and forty five minutes
after six. It is beyond
my comprehension that a fifty year old Judge can look at an analog
school clock and portend to read time but cannot subtract 33 from 45
and see Charles Ramsey’s blatant lie. A fundamental error any
competent judge would not have made.
“We
have to let him go because there is nothing else we can charge him
with.” [This is not
true. If
any crime had been committed I could have been charged with
“Accomplice” or “Aiding and abetting”!]
That
statement alone shows eagerness not in the
interest
of justice but eagerness to seek an excuse
to
punish. What
animal on this earth seeks excuses to
torture
their own kind? What normal animal does that?
“Distrust all in whom the impulse to punish is
great”
Such
a judge certainly cannot be trusted to administer justice to
anyone.
Judge Post screamed:
“We still have a dead child
She is dead wrong!
What
we have here is a man whom the Court of Criminal
Appeals declared did not commit a crime Judge Dyanda Post sent
him to prison for!
56
What we still have in prison is an
innocent woman who dropped the phone and ran to her child to find
him lying on a ceramic tile floor where he had fallen!
What we have here is a man who has lost his only son
to an accident and has spent forty four months in torture because of
a perjured probable Cause Affadavit initiated by vengeance and
perpetuated by the defective ego of a publicity seeking sadistic
prosecutor and judge!
What we have here is a prejudiced judge
with clinically definable Adult Attention Deficit Disorder in denial
of the testimony of Mrs. Nora Stanart, the State’s the ear witness
to the accident, “I’ve got to go, mom, something’s happened to
Ben.”
What we have in prison is an innocent woman who
lost her only son to an accident and has spent forty months thus far
and likely half that much again in torture because the perjured
probable Cause Affadavit failed and prosecutor Charles Ramsey had to
railroad someone as a scapegoat lest the public discover his
gullibility of believing that perjured Probable Cause Affadavit by
his George Klatt.
What we have is two innocent parents who lost
their only child to an unwitnessed unforeseeable accident. Torn to
pieces by the loss of their child, torturously torn apart, and are
being tormented to death by
the tyrannical criminals in the Mayes County justice system
that was created to protect us all.
December
12, 2004.
Marie lost her appeal; typical of an indigent individual in
the court system. The
reasons are primarily rendered ineffective assistance of
counsel.
Misrepresentations of fact and just plain misquoting of case
law by attorney general Nancy Connley {i.e.; confusing the word
“related” with “included”}. Marie’s appellate counsel did not rebut
such improprieties…dictated by the state that she (Catrina Conrad
Legler) is not allowed by the statutes to do so for an indigent
client.
57
Part
XIV will require weeks of research and preparation to show in detail
how and why Marie lost her grasp for justice. She is innocent of any wrong
doing and without help will spend the rest of her natural[?] life in
prison…simply because she did not have any money to buy
justice.
I, John Schoonover, now out and unshackled, am supplying that money
necessary to appeal the Oklahoma court’s erroneous and unjust
decision to the 10th Circuit Federal Court in
Denver where justice will prevail as it is not subject to
favouritism of a small town, but powerful, tyrant.
Though no longer gagged by the system I have been warned and
threatened not to write what you have just read; not to make waves,
not to ruffle feathers.
Not to exercise my right of free speech. I have been threatened with
harassment and even lawsuits for slander. What slander? I’ve told the truth! I do run the risk of being
“silenced.”
I’ve
dug deep. So deep that
some proof is buried in the past. I cannot prove that one of
the key figures was one of Mayes most prolific crack manufacture and
dealer. That teenagers
at Witaker Childrens Home in Pryor were, in 1975, at least, given
his cocaine for sexual favours. The dealers that I have come
into contact with in prison have given me many names …but one can
say, “consider the source” and it is true that the probability of
resentment toward certain officials would tend to have a
questionable influence on what I was told. Two many pieces of the
puzzle have been ensconed and I cannot present a clear and complete
uncontrovertable picture of the drug cartel in Mayes County. For me to print all of what
I have learned, some of which I cannot prove, this would of
necessity be a work of fiction. Fiction will not free my
innocent wife; thus this is not a work of fiction. The tyrants I have written
of exist and Marie and I are not the only individuals who have
succumbed to their tyranny.
These are small tyrants in a small town. Tyrants like these is why
the Constitution was written:
To protect us all from them.
Forty four months I spent caged before the Mayes County
tyrants were ordered to release me. How much longer for
Marie? I was
there. My “Sentencing
Statement” says it all.
Almost. At that
time I did not know that there was a 44mm fracture that occurred
after Ben’s MRI and before autopsy.
How desperate will tyrants get to cover their ass?
John
Schoonover,
13 December, 2004
58
Back
/ Next
/ Home
| 
